Life Technologies

Life Technologies Parkinson’s disease cell models—part 3

Issue link: http://life-technologies.uberflip.com/i/368629

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 14 of 33

15 Life Technologies ™ | lifetechnologies.com/parkinsons When combined, these genetic analysis methodologies can streamline the TAL-editing process. Table 1 compares the advantages, limitations, and suggested applications of each method. Methodology Advantages Limitations When to use GeneArt ® Genomic Cleavage Detection assay • Inexpensive • Can detect small changes in homozygous state of DNA— NHEJ and HDR editing • Not quantitative • Limited use if editing heterozygous loci to homozygous loci • Triaging colonies from editing via NHEJ repair TaqMan ® SNP Genotyping Assay • Inexpensive • Fast • Clearly distinguishes changes in allele status • Only detects changes in alleles that the assay is designed for— may not detect indels from NHEJ repair • Triaging colonies from editing via homologous recombination Ion PGM ™ sequencing • Can specifically detect all changes in a population • Quantitative results • Higher cost compared to other assays • Longer workflow • Best used as a secondary assay— for confirmation and quantitation of editing in populations identified from primary screens Table 1. Comparison of the three genomic analysis methodologies. Methods

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Life Technologies - Life Technologies Parkinson’s disease cell models—part 3