Life Technologies

Life Technologies Parkinson’s disease cell models—part 3

Issue link: http://life-technologies.uberflip.com/i/368629

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 33

5 Life Technologies ™ | lifetechnologies.com/parkinsons "Dr. Birgitt Schuele, ISSCR 2013— Generating Parkinson's disease models" (18:20) Watch the ISSCR 2013 presentation by Dr. Birgitt Schuele of The Parkinson's Institute. contribution of α-synuclein deposits to PD-relevant phenotypes seen in cells derived from these iPSC lines. Next, to understand the impacts of the LRRK2 G2019S and GBA N370S mutations, we studied an iPSC line harboring both mutations, generated from a 61-year-old male donor with severe PD symptoms, and corrected each mutation back to wild type. LRRK2 (leucine-rich repeat kinase 2) is a large multi-domain protein that contains protein-protein interaction domains flanking a catalytic core that harbors a GTPase and a kinase domain. Although the exact role of the LRRK2 gene in Parkinson's disease is unknown, several mutations in LRRK2 have been linked to PD, with G2019S being the most common one [4]. The GBA gene codes for glucocerebrosidase, which is involved in normal lysosomal function. Mutations in the GBA gene, such as N370S, greatly reduce or eliminate glucocerebrosidase enzyme activity, and cause toxic levels of glucocerebroside and related substances to build up within cells. This can lead to tissue and organ damage. Mutations in GBA are associated with Parkinson's disease, increasing the probability of developing the disease by five-fold [5]. Using GeneArt ® Precision TALs technology, heterozygous mutations in the LRRK2 and GBA genes were edited back to homozygous wild type via homology-directed repair (HDR). Cells differentiated from the resulting parental and edited iPSC lines will be used in future phenotypic studies. http://www.youtube.com watch?v=pJiMCwQ1Ad4 To be linked in UberFlip

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Life Technologies - Life Technologies Parkinson’s disease cell models—part 3